| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bad Data back Door |
| Date: | 2012-10-08 18:13:52 |
| Message-ID: | 13492.1349720032@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> writes:
> On Oct 5, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Now, having said that, I think it has to be the reponsibility of the FDW
>> to apply any required check ... which makes this a bug report against
>> oracle_fdw, not the core system. (FWIW, contrib/file_fdw depends on the
>> COPY code, which will check encoding.)
> FWIW, I believe that dblink does not check encoding.
In dblink's case, that boils down to trusting a remote instance of
Postgres to get this right, which doesn't seem totally unreasonable.
But I wouldn't object to adding checks there if someone wanted to submit
a patch.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2012-10-08 18:23:05 | Re: Bad Data back Door |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2012-10-08 17:56:58 | Re: Bad Data back Door |