From: | "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Doc patch to note which system catalogs have oids |
Date: | 2012-10-02 15:46:37 |
Message-ID: | 1349192797.29115.4@mofo |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/25/2012 12:28:13 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 09/23/2012 08:57:45 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> > The attached patch documents the oid column of those
> > system catalogs having an oid.
>
> Don't use the first version of this patch (oid_doc.patch)
> without discarding the last hunk. The last hunk
> introduces an error by duplicating the
> documentation of the pg_roles.oid column.
>
> (I am reluctant to post a revised version
> since there's already 3 versions floating
> around representing 2 different approaches
> and no consensus as to which approach, if any, should
> be taken.)
I have figured out how to use the commitfest
pages to track what should be reviewed.
Submitting a corrected version of the very
first patch, which treats the oids as
regular columns.
I am now submitting patches to the commitfest
for review. (I'm not sure how I missed this.)
Regards,
Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
oid_doc_v4.patch | text/x-patch | 12.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-10-02 15:58:57 | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-10-02 15:08:54 | Re: Hash id in pg_stat_statements |