Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Why is that not called "max_wal_segments"? wal_keep_segments sounds like
>> its been through Google translate.
> Because it's not a maximum?
Indeed. It would really be more like min_wal_segments, if we wanted to
name it that way.
regards, tom lane