Re: "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary
Date: 2022-01-07 16:41:56
Message-ID: 1348387.1641573716@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
> In glossary, the title of each term about process seems to consist of the process name and "(process)", e.g., Checkpointer (process). But I found that "(process)" is missing for the following three terms about process. Attached is the patch to add "(process)" to them.

> - Auxiliary process
> - Startup process
> - WAL receiver

I think "Auxiliary process (process)" is redundant to the point
of being silly. +1 for addiing it to "WAL receiver", though,
since that's not obviously a process.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2022-01-07 21:52:56 Re: random_page_cost configuration parameter
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2022-01-07 14:37:53 "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary