From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Gripes about walsender command processing |
Date: | 2020-09-15 18:48:55 |
Message-ID: | 1347966.1600195735@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:34:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (I don't quite follow your comment about repslot drop, btw.)
> There is already a command tag equivalent to DROP_REPLICATION_SLOT:
> $ git grep REPLICATION -- */cmdtaglist.h
> src/include/tcop/cmdtaglist.h:PG_CMDTAG(CMDTAG_DROP_REPLICATION_SLOT,
> "DROP REPLICATION SLOT", false, false, false)
[ blink ... ] So why is it that DropReplicationSlot does
SetQueryCompletion(&qc, CMDTAG_DROP_REPLICATION_SLOT, 0);
EndCommand(&qc, DestRemote, false);
when the caller will immediately after that do
SetQueryCompletion(&qc, CMDTAG_SELECT, 0);
EndCommand(&qc, DestRemote, true);
StartLogicalReplication has a similar weirdness.
The more I look at this code, the more broken it seems.
Anyway, independently of whether walsender should be sending multiple
command-complete messages, I don't think I really approve of including
replication commands in the CommandTag enum. It still seems like a
type pun. However, it looks like we'd have to duplicate
SetQueryCompletion/EndCommand if we don't want to do that, so maybe
I'd better just hold my nose and do it that way.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2020-09-15 18:51:10 | Re: Simplified version of read_binary_file (src/backend/utils/adt/genfile.c) |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2020-09-15 18:42:40 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |