Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl> writes:
> The default param that's in the middle. Would it be hard, or do anyone
> objects against adding 'default' keyword there, so one doesn't have to
> substitute default param 3, when he only wants to override 2nd in
> funct(1,2,3) ?
Yes, and yes. We can only allow eliminating parameters from the right,
else it becomes impossibly ambiguous.
regards, tom lane