Re: Doc typo: lexems -> lexemes

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, dan(at)coffeecode(dot)net, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Doc typo: lexems -> lexemes
Date: 2012-09-12 14:06:15
Message-ID: 1347458775.16215.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 10:00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Magnus, are you saying we don't backpatch wording improvements, but we
> do backpatch spelling corrections?

You could argue that a spelling correction is a bug fix but a wording
improvement is a new feature. (Unless the old wording is wildly
confusing or inaccurate.)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-12 14:09:57 Re: Doc typo: lexems -> lexemes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-12 14:00:39 Re: Doc typo: lexems -> lexemes