Re: too much pgbench init output

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: too much pgbench init output
Date: 2012-09-06 03:14:15
Message-ID: 1346901255.25201.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 23:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > b) There is no indication of where the end is.
>
> Well, surely *that* can be fixed in a noncontroversial way: just
> print "M/N tuples done", where N is the target.

I have made this change. I won't pursue using \r if others find it
useful as is.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2012-09-06 03:20:29 Re: [repost] Help me develop new commit_delay advice
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2012-09-06 03:01:56 Re: Draft release notes complete