| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Noisy CVS updates |
| Date: | 2008-09-07 14:39:25 |
| Message-ID: | 13456.1220798365@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> (Personally, I never do "cvs update" without "make distclean" first;
>> there are too many other ways to get screwed by updating a live build
>> tree.)
> I assume that you are talking about conflicts. In fact, that's one of
> the main reasons for wanting a quiet update so that I can catch those
> right away when I am working on some files. I do an automatic update
> daily to keep current with the head. I don't do a "make distclean"
> first because I may be working on something and I want to keep the
> changes in the tree to try stuff and report patches against HEAD.
Huh? distclean does not remove any source-code changes, only derived
files.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2008-09-07 14:40:26 | Re: Noisy CVS updates |
| Previous Message | M2Y | 2008-09-07 14:37:49 | Some newbie questions |