| From: | Vincent Veyron <vv(dot)lists(at)wanadoo(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sébastien Lorion <sl(at)thestrangefactory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Amazon High I/O instances |
| Date: | 2012-08-21 08:12:21 |
| Message-ID: | 1345536741.3438.7.camel@asus-1001PX.home |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Le mardi 21 août 2012 à 01:33 -0400, Sébastien Lorion a écrit :
>
>
> Since Amazon has added new high I/O instance types and EBS volumes,
> anyone has done some benchmark of PostgreSQL on them ?
>
I wonder : is there a reason why you have to go through the complexity
of such a setup, rather than simply use bare metal and get good
performance with simplicity?
For instance, the dedibox I use for my app (visible in sig) costs 14,00
euros/month, and sits at .03% load average with 5 active users; you can
admin it like a home pc.
--
Vincent Veyron
http://marica.fr/
Gestion informatique des sinistres d'assurances et des dossiers contentieux pour le service juridique
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vincent Veyron | 2012-08-21 08:18:03 | Re: Amazon High I/O instances |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2012-08-21 07:56:35 | Re: How hard would a "path" operator be to implement in PostgreSQL |