Re: mail to pgsql-general lost?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: depesz <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mail to pgsql-general lost?
Date: 2012-08-16 14:28:52
Message-ID: 1345126937-sup-9480@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of jue ago 16 10:14:41 -0400 2012:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of jue ago 16 09:46:28 -0400 2012:
> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> >> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Is there a way to find out how big it was? IIRC, depesz wrote
> >> something about cutting the size down for the second message - maybe
> >> it got rejected because it was too big?
> >
> > The maximum allowed message length seems to be 40000 bytes (except for
> > lists that have raised it explicitely such as pgsql-hackers). Should we
> > raise that limit?
>
> I think the important thing is:
> 1) can we define two limits, one that just ends up being moderated
> instead of rejected?

Yes, I think we can do that.

> and
> 2) the system should *tell* depesz that it was too big, somehow.Is that broken?

I don't really know the answer to this. Yes, it should send out an
email informing of the problem. Not sure why it's not working.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-08-16 14:47:30 Re: mail to pgsql-general lost?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2012-08-16 14:14:41 Re: mail to pgsql-general lost?