Re: Partitioning...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Milen Kulev" <makulev(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioning...
Date: 2006-06-12 22:58:06
Message-ID: 13439.1150153086@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Milen Kulev" <makulev(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> What is wrong with random() ?

Not guaranteed to be stable across the multiple evaluations that the
rule will perform ... remember a rule is a macro and has the usual
multiple-evaluation gotchas in the face of volatile arguments.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Milen Kulev 2006-06-12 23:04:55 Re: Partitioning...
Previous Message Milen Kulev 2006-06-12 22:34:44 Re: Partitioning...