Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2017-01-24 13:37:47
Message-ID: 13434.1485265067@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Personally I think we should aim to have this in as a non default build
> mode in pg10 if it can be made ready, and aim to make it default in pg11 at
> least for Windows.

AFAIK we haven't committed to accepting this at all, let alone trying
to do so on a tight schedule. And I believe there was general agreement
that we would not accept it as something to maintain in parallel with
the existing makefiles. If we have to maintain two build systems, we
have that already.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-01-24 13:51:02 Re: Declarative partitioning vs. BulkInsertState
Previous Message David Steele 2017-01-24 13:33:52 Re: Online enabling of page level checksums