| From: | fearless_fool <rdpoor(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | multiple SAVEPOINTs without RELEASE SAVEPOINT |
| Date: | 2012-07-13 21:05:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1342213500675-5716594.post@n5.nabble.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Is there any penalty for repeatedly doing
SAVEPOINT eugene
without a corresponding
RELEASE SAVEPOINT
?
In my case, I have a table with a unique index constraint. Multiple
processes will be trying to "create or lookup" a record, so trapping the
unique index constraint seems the most robust way to detect if the record
already exists. The overall structure I'm using (in pseudo-Ruby syntax):
begin
response = execute("SAVEPOINT eugene;
INSERT INTO symbols (name) VALUES
('#{name}') RETURNING id")
rescue
# arrive here on a constraint violation if the name already existed
response = execute("ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT eugene;
SELECT id FROM symbols WHERE symbols.name =
'#{name}'")
ensure
# is this RELEASE strictly required?
execute("RELEASE SAVEPOINT eugene")
end
(On a related note, would I be better off using advisory locks? And would
that be sufficient in the face of multiple processes?)
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/multiple-SAVEPOINTs-without-RELEASE-SAVEPOINT-tp5716594.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Perry Smith | 2012-07-14 15:57:30 | Help me follow... |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-07-13 18:42:30 | great infoworld article on postgresql/enterprisedb |