Re: Schema version management

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Schema version management
Date: 2012-07-13 19:41:27
Message-ID: 1342208487.23760.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2012-07-12 at 16:14 +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> Could work. But I think it's more relevant and useful to keep all objects
> in a schema in its own directory.

Personally, I hate this proposed nested directory structure. I would
like to have all objects in one directory.

But there is a lot of "personally" in this thread, of course.

> I think its more common you want to "show all objects within schema X"
> than "show all schemas of type X".

Or maybe it isn't ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-07-13 19:46:01 Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-07-13 19:36:13 Re: Schema version management