Re: Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10
Date: 2017-03-30 14:40:20
Message-ID: 1341.1490884820@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> I propose we go for a week delay in closing the commit fest, and we
>> decide right now. Ideally I like to to see delay in one-week increments
>> _and_ announce that a week before each deadline.

> Summary of opinions on this thread:

> - Tom thinks the RMT should consider extending by a day or two.

FWIW, while I'm sure we had a reason (back at the Ottawa 2016 meeting)
for limiting the final 'fest to just a month, I'm quite sure we did
not allow for most of the senior hackers being at a conference during
the last week of that time. So I now concur with Bruce's suggestion
that a week's delay would be suitable.

In past years this sort of decision would have been taken by -core,
and given the number of core members who have already weighed in
on this thread, I think Bruce's proposal would have passed easily.
But since we just delegated the setting of feature freeze to the RMT,
they are the ones who ought to do it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2017-03-30 14:49:05 Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2017-03-30 14:30:56 Re: Logical decoding on standby