Re: new --maintenance-db options

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new --maintenance-db options
Date: 2012-06-25 18:49:24
Message-ID: 1340650078-sup-1192@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun jun 25 11:57:36 -0400 2012:

> Really, I think
> pg_upgrade needs this option too, unless we're going to kill the
> problem at its root by providing a reliable way to enumerate database
> names without first knowing the name one that you can connect to.

I think pg_upgrade could do this one task by using a standalone backend
instead of a full-blown postmaster. It should be easy enough ...

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2012-06-25 18:50:54 Re: Catalog/Metadata consistency during changeset extraction from wal
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-06-25 18:19:47 Re: Catalog/Metadata consistency during changeset extraction from wal