Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
Date: 2006-07-13 14:44:19
Message-ID: 13404.1152801859@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>>> 18% in s_lock is definitely bad :-(. Were you able to determine which
>>> LWLock(s) are accounting for the contention?
>>
>> Yes. We were interested in that too. Some people did addtional tests
>> to determin that. I don't have the report handy now. I will report
>> back next week.

> Sorry for the delay. Finally I got the oprofile data. It's
> huge(34MB). If you are interested, I can put somewhere. Please let me
> know.

Yes, please.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lukas Smith 2006-07-13 14:45:22 Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-07-13 14:40:16 Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2006-07-13 16:30:50 Re: size of pg_dump files containing bytea values
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2006-07-13 13:54:21 Re: hyper slow after upgrade to 8.1.4