| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Beta2? |
| Date: | 1999-05-11 14:20:06 |
| Message-ID: | 13395.926432406@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> OK, I guess that's reasonable for m68k hardware. I wonder whether
>> anything is assuming that MAXALIGN is at least 4...
> BTW, from interfaces/libpq/fe-exec.c:
> * Requirements for correct function are:
> * PGRESULT_ALIGN_BOUNDARY >= sizeof(pointer)
> * to ensure the initial pointer in a block is not overwritten.
> [snip]
> #define PGRESULT_ALIGN_BOUNDARY MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF /* from configure */
I think you've spotted the problem, all right. I'll see what I can do
about it...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-05-11 14:35:55 | Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling 6.5 cvs (Linux, gcc 2.7.2, egcs 1.12) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-05-11 14:18:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error |