Re: pg_basebackup --xlog compatibility break

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup --xlog compatibility break
Date: 2012-06-11 21:28:06
Message-ID: 1339450086.11971.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On sön, 2012-06-10 at 13:43 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Next question is -
> >> suggestions for naming of said paramter?
> >
> > --xlog-method=something? And/or -Xsomething, which would automatically
> > enable -x?
>
> How's this?

I wouldn't make -x and -X exclusive. The way I understood this is, -x
means include xlog, and -X says how to.

I guess either way of looking at it has its merits.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2012-06-11 21:40:35 Re: pg_basebackup --xlog compatibility break
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-06-11 19:44:16 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3