Re: hot standby PSQL 9.1 Windows 2008 Servers

From: chinnaobi <chinnaobi(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hot standby PSQL 9.1 Windows 2008 Servers
Date: 2012-05-22 16:15:38
Message-ID: 1337703338369-5709495.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Dear Robert,

Thank you very much for the reply.

You mean when the primary which is going to switch its role to standby might
not have sent all the WAL records to the standby and If it is switched to
standby it has more WAL records than the standby which is now serves as
primary. Is it ??

It is actually the standby server which has to be restored from archive when
it is switching to primary right .. Not the primary which is switching to
standby ??

Regards,
Reddy.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/hot-standby-PSQL-9-1-Windows-2008-Servers-tp5708637p5709495.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-05-22 16:18:44 Re: Per-Database Roles
Previous Message Florian Pflug 2012-05-22 16:13:57 Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE