Re: Draft release notes complete

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete
Date: 2012-05-10 17:29:30
Message-ID: 1336670970.29567.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2012-05-10 at 09:55 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 5/10/12 9:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On tor, 2012-05-10 at 10:44 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> The big take-away is that the release notes are mostly for blame and
> >> to designate a go-to person for feature problems, not for giving
> >> credit,
> >
> > Then reviewers should be removed.
>
> I disagree. We're trying to get more reviewers, and encourage them to
> do more reviewing. Giving credit is a big part of that.

Are you disagreeing with Bruce's premise, my logic, or the conclusion?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-05-10 17:44:23 Re: Draft release notes complete
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-05-10 17:21:07 Re: Draft release notes complete