From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ? |
Date: | 2012-05-06 20:55:54 |
Message-ID: | 1336337754.19151.244.camel@hvost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 13:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ?
>
> Same as it's been for a long time: FOR UPDATE [ OF table_name ]
> works fine.
Ok, then it is just documentation fix
currently it is missing from \h declare and docs
hannu(at)hvost:~/work/pg92$ TESTINST/bin/psql -p 9200 -h /tmp
psql (9.2devel)
Type "help" for help.
hannu=# \h declare
Command: DECLARE
Description: define a cursor
Syntax:
DECLARE name [ BINARY ] [ INSENSITIVE ] [ [ NO ] SCROLL ]
CURSOR [ { WITH | WITHOUT } HOLD ] FOR query
hannu=#
> > older docs claim that the syntax is supported, but gives an error
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-declare.html
>
> Old docs incorrectly said that it was FOR UPDATE [ OF column_name ]
> but we have never implemented it that way.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2012-05-07 07:33:56 | Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-06 17:17:02 | Re: What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ? |