From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Katsuhiko Okano <okano(dot)katsuhiko(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 |
Date: | 2006-09-03 16:15:27 |
Message-ID: | 13361.1157300127@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> OTOH I think we only need to store live Xids and those finished that
> wrote a WAL record; we can drop subaborted and subcommitted if they
> didn't.
While reviewing this thread, I see Alvaro already had the idea I just
came to...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-09-03 16:27:48 | Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-03 16:08:58 | Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-03 19:25:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-03 16:08:58 | Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 |