| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christoph Dalitz <christoph(dot)dalitz(at)hs-niederrhein(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com>, PG Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Status of tablespaces |
| Date: | 2003-01-28 15:37:19 |
| Message-ID: | 13349.1043768239@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Christoph Dalitz <christoph(dot)dalitz(at)hs-niederrhein(dot)de> writes:
> What might be useful were some kind of quota (on the database
> side, not the operating system) for a tablespace.
> Any plans to implement something in that direction?
No. Enforcing a quota would imply creating a synchronization bottleneck
among all update operations, so I'd resist any such proposal...
especially seeing that the problem can already be solved at the operating
system level.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mariusz Czułada | 2003-01-28 15:38:36 | Re: Status of tablespaces |
| Previous Message | Mark Aufflick | 2003-01-28 15:29:55 | Re: all backends (pg7.2.3 / redhat 7.2) die due to unexpected signal 14 (SIGALRM) |