Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Date: 1999-03-15 15:31:04
Message-ID: 13347.921511864@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can someone remind me where we left this memory context stuff?

Jan put in some changes to allow palloc()'d space to be freed more
cheaply. The more sweeping rewrite that I was suggesting is not done,
but perhaps we can reconsider it for 6.6 or sometime later. I don't
think we need to worry about it for 6.5.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-15 15:31:08 Re: [HACKERS] new mirror
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-03-15 15:27:52 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof