Re: Another review of URI for libpq, v7 submission

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Alex <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another review of URI for libpq, v7 submission
Date: 2012-04-11 07:46:38
Message-ID: 1334129965-sup-5552@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun abr 09 16:41:50 -0300 2012:

> There are three minor things that need to be changed for this to be
> committable:

Committed this patch after some more editorialization; in particular the
test was rewritten so that instead of trying to connect, it uses
PQconninfoParse to figure out how the URI is parsed, which makes a
lot more sense. Also some other changes to the accepted URI, in
particular so that username, pwd, and port are possible to be specified
when using unix-domain sockets.

Now that it is a done deal I'm sure people will start complaining how
bad the documentation change was; please keep the flames up.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ozgun Erdogan 2012-04-11 08:14:44 Command counter increment vs updating an active snapshot
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2012-04-11 07:40:05 [Patch] Fix little typo in a comment