| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment |
| Date: | 2018-10-02 04:08:06 |
| Message-ID: | 13340.1538453286@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:22 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> (I think we could drop the savepoint
>> too, no?)
> One advantage of keeping the savepoint is that we don't need to
> explicitly drop the objects which we have created temporarily for this
> test.
They'll go away anyway at the end of the transaction that the whole
script is wrapped in. (But it might be worth choosing slightly less
generic object names, to avoid a conflict against other sub-tests
later in that script.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2018-10-02 04:18:01 | Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive and anti-wraparound ru |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-10-02 04:03:55 | Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment |