From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Last gasp |
Date: | 2012-04-05 19:15:47 |
Message-ID: | 1333653220-sup-4433@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue abr 05 15:40:17 -0300 2012:
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > The FK locking patch isn't on this list; however, I'm hijacking this
> > thread to say that some benchmarking runs we tried weren't all that
> > great, showing 9% performance degradation on stock pgbench -- i.e. a
> > large hit that will harm everybody even if they are not using FKs at
> > all. I'm thus setting the patch returned with feedback, which is sure
> > to make several hackers happy and tons of users unhappy.
>
> Ouch! That's a real bummer. It makes me glad that you tested it, but
> I can't say I'm happy about the outcome. Did you get in any insight
> into where the regression is coming from?
Not really -- after reaching that conclusion I dropped immediate work on
the patch to do other stuff (like checking whether there's any other
patch I can help with in commitfest). I will resume work later, for a
(hopefully early) 9.3 submission.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2012-04-05 19:20:59 | Re: Last gasp |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-05 19:07:29 | Re: Last gasp |