| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: List of hostaddrs not supported |
| Date: | 2017-06-08 14:50:26 |
| Message-ID: | 13329.1496933426@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It doesn't seem like a problem to me if somebody else wants to extend
> it to hostaddr, though. Whether that change belongs in v10 or v11 is
> debatable. I would object to adding this as an open item with me as
> the owner because doesn't seem to me to be a must-fix issue, but I
> don't mind someone else doing the work.
If you want to define multiple-hostaddrs as a future feature, that
seems fine, but I think Heikki is describing actual bugs. The minimum
that I think needs to be done for v10 is to make libpq reject a hostaddr
string with the wrong number of entries (either different from the
host list, or different from 1).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-08 15:02:16 | Re: Does pg_upgrade really support "make installcheck"? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-06-08 14:49:14 | Re: Does pg_upgrade really support "make installcheck"? |