Re: Should this require CASCADE?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should this require CASCADE?
Date: 2002-07-11 03:31:20
Message-ID: 13325.1026358280@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Sounds good to me, and I don't think we need to require RESTRICT just
> because the standard says so. Does the standard require RESTRICT for
> every DROP or just drops that have foreign keys?

Syntactically, it requires RESTRICT or CASCADE on *every* form of DROP.
I don't think we're willing to do that...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-11 03:33:27 Re: Should this require CASCADE?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-07-11 03:30:41 Re: Should this require CASCADE?