Re: several attstattarget-related improvements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: several attstattarget-related improvements
Date: 2023-06-28 22:10:09
Message-ID: 1332450.1687990209@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 6/28/23 16:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> - 0001: Change type of pg_statistic_ext.stxstattarget, to match
>> attstattarget.  Maybe this should go into PG16, for consistency?

> Not sure about 0001 vs PG16, it'd require catversion bump.

Yeah, past beta1 I think we should be conservative about bumping
catversion. Suggest you hold this for now, and if we find some
more-compelling reason for a catversion bump in v16, we can sneak
it in at that time. Otherwise, I won't cry if it waits for v17.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2023-06-28 22:30:43 Re: Row pattern recognition
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-06-28 21:56:55 Re: Changing types of block and chunk sizes in memory contexts