Re: Gsoc2012 Idea --- Social Network database schema

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Qi Huang <huangqiyx(at)hotmail(dot)com>, neil(dot)conway <neil(dot)conway(at)gmail(dot)com>, daniel <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Gsoc2012 Idea --- Social Network database schema
Date: 2012-03-21 14:47:23
Message-ID: 1332341101-sup-5656@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié mar 21 11:35:54 -0300 2012:

> Now that would all be fine if this were a widely-desired feature, but
> AFAIR the user demand for it has been about nil. So I'm leaning to
> the position that we don't want it.

I disagree with there being zero interest ... the "order by random()"
stuff does come up occasionally.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-03-21 14:48:16 Re: Finer Extension dependencies
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-21 14:43:17 Re: renaming domain constraint