Re: query planner does not canonicalize infix operators

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Will Leinweber <will(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: query planner does not canonicalize infix operators
Date: 2012-03-13 03:21:26
Message-ID: 1331608886.9688.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2012-03-12 at 13:04 -0700, Daniel Farina wrote:
> On the more constructive side, if I were to till the fields to change
> this aspect of the optimizer, is there any interest in rectifying the
> operator-function confusion?

I once proposed to do that [1], but there was not much enthusiasm
elsewhere. I still think it'd be worthwhile, for the reasons you
mentioned. But it would be a lot of detail work.

[1] http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1309640525.26660.22.camel@vanquo.pezone.net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joachim Wieland 2012-03-13 03:35:52 Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2012-03-13 03:10:37 Re: Measuring relation free space