From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Mackler <adammackler(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Learning SQL: nested CTE and UNION |
Date: | 2012-07-31 17:43:31 |
Message-ID: | 13313.1343756611@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice |
Adam Mackler <adammackler(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ... But this does not work:
> WITH outmost AS (
> SELECT 1
> UNION (WITH innermost as (SELECT 2)
> SELECT * FROM innermost
> UNION SELECT 3)
> )
> SELECT * FROM outmost;
> Result:
> ERROR: relation "innermost" does not exist
> LINE 4: SELECT * FROM innermost
This is a bug :-(. The parse analysis code seems to think that WITH can
only be attached to the top level or a leaf-level SELECT within a set
operation tree; but the grammar follows the SQL standard which says
no such thing. The WITH gets accepted, and attached to the
intermediate-level UNION which is where syntactically it should go,
and then it's entirely ignored during parse analysis. Will see about
fixing it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Palle Girgensohn | 2012-07-31 19:02:14 | build postgresql on Mac OS X mountain lion with ossp-uuid |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2012-07-31 16:50:00 | Re: several problems in pg_receivexlog |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | George McIlwaine | 2012-07-31 21:16:59 | postgres domain service account won't start the postgres service |
Previous Message | Adam Mackler | 2012-07-31 14:47:20 | Re: Learning SQL: nested CTE and UNION |