From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Syslog and pg_options (for RPMs) |
Date: | 2001-02-08 22:50:55 |
Message-ID: | 13312.981672655@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
ncm(at)zembu(dot)com (Nathan Myers) writes:
> Not so fast... logger just writes its arguments to syslog. I don't
> see any indication that it (portably) reads its standard input.
FWIW, the HPUX 10.20 man page for logger sez:
A message can be given on the command line, which is logged
immediately, or a file is read and each line is logged. If no file or
message is specified, the contents of the standard input are logged.
and they also claim
STANDARDS CONFORMANCE
logger: XPG4, POSIX.2
The fact that it's POSIX.2 rather than POSIX.1 might worry folks, but
I suspect the majority of systems will have it if they have syslog.
(Curiously, the HP man pages do not say that syslog(3) or syslogd(1m)
conform to *any* standard ... hmm ... is logger more portable than
syslog?)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Pilosov | 2001-02-08 23:11:30 | Re: Plan for straightening out the include-file mess |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-08 22:38:17 | Plan for straightening out the include-file mess |