Re: Syslog and pg_options (for RPMs)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Syslog and pg_options (for RPMs)
Date: 2001-02-08 22:50:55
Message-ID: 13312.981672655@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ncm(at)zembu(dot)com (Nathan Myers) writes:
> Not so fast... logger just writes its arguments to syslog. I don't
> see any indication that it (portably) reads its standard input.

FWIW, the HPUX 10.20 man page for logger sez:

A message can be given on the command line, which is logged
immediately, or a file is read and each line is logged. If no file or
message is specified, the contents of the standard input are logged.

and they also claim

STANDARDS CONFORMANCE
logger: XPG4, POSIX.2

The fact that it's POSIX.2 rather than POSIX.1 might worry folks, but
I suspect the majority of systems will have it if they have syslog.

(Curiously, the HP man pages do not say that syslog(3) or syslogd(1m)
conform to *any* standard ... hmm ... is logger more portable than
syslog?)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Pilosov 2001-02-08 23:11:30 Re: Plan for straightening out the include-file mess
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-08 22:38:17 Plan for straightening out the include-file mess