| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq |
| Date: | 2012-03-06 17:30:28 |
| Message-ID: | 1331055028.19112.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tis, 2012-03-06 at 10:11 +0200, Alexander Shulgin wrote:
> On 03/06/2012 01:09 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > On ons, 2012-02-22 at 12:26 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> >> I started collecting up all the variants that do work as an
> >> initial shell script regression test, so that changes don't break
> >> something that already works. Here are all the variations that
> >> already work, setup so that a series of "1" outputs is passing:
> >
> > Let's please add something like this to the patch. Otherwise, I foresee
> > a lot of potential to break corner cases in the future.
>
> I've included a (separate) test shell script based on Greg's cases in
> one of the updates. What would be preferred place to plug it in?
> Override installcheck in libpq Makefile?
I think that would be the right place.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2012-03-06 17:37:01 | Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-03-06 17:23:52 | Re: Checksums, state of play |