Re: Proposal: Removing 32 bit support starting from PG17++

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Hans Buschmann <buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Removing 32 bit support starting from PG17++
Date: 2023-05-24 21:44:36
Message-ID: 1330799.1684964676@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Dropping CPUs without native atomic operations / without a way to do tear-free
> 8 byte reads would make several substantial performance improvements easier,
> while not really dropping any relevant platform.

Hmm, can we really expect atomic 8-byte reads on "relevant" 32-bit
platforms? I'd be on board with this if so, but it sounds a bit
optimistic.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-05-24 21:49:58 Re: Atomic ops for unlogged LSN
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-05-24 21:41:37 Re: Proposal: Removing 32 bit support starting from PG17++