| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
| Date: | 2012-03-01 17:00:36 |
| Message-ID: | 1330621236.23823.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tor, 2012-03-01 at 20:56 +0900, Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> How about moving postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink,
That's probably a good move. If this were C++, we might try to subclass
this whole thing a bit, to avoid code duplication, but I don't see an
easy way to do that here.
> with renaming to dblink_fdw_validator?
Well, it's not the validator of the dblink_fdw, so maybe something like
basic_postgresql_fdw_validator.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-03-01 17:19:54 | Re: incompatible pointer types with newer zlib |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-03-01 16:40:59 | Re: COPY with hints, rebirth |