Re: REASSIGN OWNED lacks support for FDWs

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: REASSIGN OWNED lacks support for FDWs
Date: 2012-02-22 21:07:31
Message-ID: 1329944840-sup-4619@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar feb 21 21:30:39 -0300 2012:
>
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of mar feb 21 15:54:03 -0300 2012:
> >> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun feb 20 12:37:45 -0300 2012:
> >>> As per http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2012-02/msg00304.php
> >>> there is no switch case in shdepReassignOwned for foreign data wrappers.
>
> >> I'm gonna take a stab at fixing this now (the simple way).
>
> > Here's the patch I have; last minute opinions. I intend to push a
> > backpatch to 9.1 and 9.0. 8.4 has the same problem, but since Heikki
> > punted in e356743f3ed45c36dcc4d0dbf6c1e8751b3d70b5, I'm not going to
> > bother either.
>
> Looks roughly like what I expected, but I haven't tested it.

Thanks, pushed.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2012-02-22 21:19:30 Proposal: PL/pgPSM for 9.3
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-02-22 20:51:05 Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation