| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of) |
| Date: | 2012-05-31 15:23:19 |
| Message-ID: | 13287.1338477799@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 31 May 2012 15:00, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If we want to finish the beta cycle in a reasonable time period and get
>> back to actual development, we have to refrain from adding more
>> possibly-destabilizing development work to 9.2. And that is what
>> this is.
> In what way is it possibly destabilising?
I'm prepared to believe that it only affects performance, but it could
be destabilizing to that. It needs proper review and testing, and the
next CF is the right environment for that to happen.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergey Koposov | 2012-05-31 15:23:31 | Re: 9.2beta1, parallel queries, ReleasePredicateLocks, CheckForSerializableConflictIn in the oprofile |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-05-31 15:06:50 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and thousands of schemas |