Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace
Date: 2001-03-10 02:41:24
Message-ID: 13282.984192084@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

More numbers, these from a Powerbook G3 laptop running Linux 2.2:

[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ uname -a
Linux g3 2.2.18-4hpmac #1 Thu Dec 21 15:16:15 MST 2000 ppc unknown

[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ gcc -Wall -O -DINIT_WRITE -DUSE_DSYNC -DBLOCKS=1 tfsync.c
[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ time ./a.out

real 0m32.418s
user 0m0.020s
sys 0m14.020s

[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ gcc -Wall -O -DINIT_WRITE -DUSE_DSYNC -DBLOCKS=4 tfsync.c
[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ time ./a.out

real 0m10.894s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m4.030s

[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ gcc -Wall -O -DINIT_WRITE -DUSE_DSYNC -DBLOCKS=8 tfsync.c
[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ time ./a.out

real 0m7.211s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m2.200s

[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ gcc -Wall -O -DINIT_WRITE -DUSE_DSYNC -DBLOCKS=32 tfsync.c
[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ time ./a.out

real 0m4.441s
user 0m0.020s
sys 0m0.870s

[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ gcc -Wall -O -DINIT_WRITE -DUSE_DSYNC -DBLOCKS=64 tfsync.c
[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ time ./a.out

real 0m4.488s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.640s

[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ gcc -Wall -O -DINIT_WRITE -DUSE_ODSYNC -DBLOCKS=1 tfsync.c
[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ time ./a.out

real 0m3.725s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.310s

[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ gcc -Wall -O -DINIT_WRITE -DUSE_ODSYNC -DBLOCKS=4 tfsync.c
[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ time ./a.out

real 0m3.785s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.290s

[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ gcc -Wall -O -DINIT_WRITE -DUSE_ODSYNC -DBLOCKS=64 tfsync.c
[tgl(at)g3 tmp]$ time ./a.out

real 0m3.753s
user 0m0.010s
sys 0m0.300s

Starting to look like we should just use ODSYNC where available, and
forget about dumping more per write ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikheev, Vadim 2001-03-10 02:45:36 RE: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2001-03-10 02:31:36 RE: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace