From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: cursors FOR UPDATE don't return most recent row |
Date: | 2012-01-30 01:07:06 |
Message-ID: | 1327885054-sup-7077@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of sáb ene 28 01:35:33 -0300 2012:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> > I expected the FETCH to return one row, with the latest data, i.e.
> > (1, 3), but instead it's returning empty.
>
> This is the same thing I was complaining about in the bug #6123 thread,
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/9698.1327266271@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> It looks a bit ticklish to fix.
Hm. Okay, I hadn't read that.
In my FOR KEY SHARE patch I have added a heap_lock_updated_tuple that
makes heap_lock_tuple follow the update chain forward when the tuple
being locked is being updated by a concurrent transaction. I haven't
traced through FETCH to see if it makes sense to apply some of that to
it.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-01-30 01:13:43 | Re: cursors FOR UPDATE don't return most recent row |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-01-29 23:29:42 | Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps |