Re: "could not accept SSPI security context"

From: G_Hosa_Phat <jgamble(at)ciaokc(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "could not accept SSPI security context"
Date: 2012-01-23 15:06:17
Message-ID: 1327331177438-5166312.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Ahmed wrote
>
> Hi,
>
> In my email, I mistakenly assumed that the next version would be 2.0.12.0,
> which was not. My bad.
>
> I checked the source and confirmed that the 2.0.11.0 has the bug, and the
> immediate next version (2.0.11.91) has the fix. You can use the version
> 2.0.11.92
> &lt;http://pgfoundry.org/frs/?group_id=1000140&amp;release_id=1889&gt;,
> which is the latest stable release.
>
>
> -Ahmed
>
*(at)Ahmed -* Thank you so much. I just ran a quick test and everything looks
like it's going to work great. I was really going to have to start pulling
my hair out over that one if it didn't work.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/could-not-accept-SSPI-security-context-tp3275102p5166312.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stuart Bishop 2012-01-23 15:13:00 Re: Is Synchronous Postgresql Replication Slower Than Asynchronous?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-01-23 14:37:50 Re: Is Synchronous Postgresql Replication Slower Than Asynchronous?