Postgresql Replication Performance

From: sgupta <saurabh(dot)b85(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Postgresql Replication Performance
Date: 2011-12-29 09:33:04
Message-ID: 1325151184846-5107278.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

I am doing POC on Posgtresql replication. I am using latest version of
postgresql i.e. 9.1. There are multiple replication solutions avaliable in
the market (PGCluster, Pgpool-II, Slony-I). Postgresql also provide in-built
replication solutions (Streaming replication, Warm Standby and hot standby).
I am confused which solution is best for the financial application for which
I am doing POC. The application will write around 160 million records with
row size of 2.5 KB in database. My questions is for following scenarios
which replication solution will be suitable:

If I would require replication for backup purpose only
If I would require to scale the reads
If I would require High Avaliability and Consistency
Also It will be very helpful if you can share the perfomance or experience
with postgresql replication solutions.

Thanks

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Postgresql-Replication-Performance-tp5107278p5107278.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksej Trofimov 2011-12-29 14:33:45 Re: Postgresql Replication Performance
Previous Message Matteo Beccati 2011-12-29 09:03:28 Re: PostgreSQL 9.0.4 blocking in lseek?