| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: age(xid) on hot standby |
| Date: | 2011-12-28 18:24:02 |
| Message-ID: | 1325096414-sup-3427@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié dic 28 15:04:09 -0300 2011:
> The check_postgres txn_wraparound action[0] runs this query:
>
> SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) AS age FROM pg_database WHERE datallowconn ORDER BY 1, 2
>
> On a hot standby, this fails with:
>
> ERROR: cannot assign TransactionIds during recovery
>
> So, a couple of things to wonder about:
>
> Is it unreasonable to check for transaction ID wraparound on a standby?
> It should mirror the situation on the primary, shouldn't it?
>
> Should the age(xid) function do something more useful on a standby,
> e.g., have a custom error message or return null or use the transaction
> ID from the master?
I think we could just have the xid_age call
GetCurrentTransactionIdIfAny, and if that returns InvalidXid, use
ReadNewTransactionId instead. That xid_age assigns a transaction seems
more of an accident than really intended.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-12-28 19:35:34 | Re: age(xid) on hot standby |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-12-28 18:12:48 | Re: contrib/README |