Re: splitting plpython into smaller parts

Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue dic 15 12:00:13 -0300 2011:
> How to people feel about naming the files (as proposed)
>
> ! OBJS = plpython.o plpython_io.o plpython_procedure.o plpython_exec.o \
> ! plpython_plpy.o plpython_spi.o plpython_result.o plpython_cursor.o \
> ! plpython_plan.o plpython_subtransaction.o plpython_functions.o \
> ! plpython_elog.o
>
> vs. say
>
> ! OBJS = main.o io.o procedure.o exec.o plpy.o spi.o result.o cursor.o \
> ! plan.o subtransaction.o functions.o elog.o
>
> ?

I find the extra prefix unnecessary and ugly; if we had to had a
prefix, I'd choose a shorter one (maybe "py" instead of "plpython_").

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support