| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Alexander Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq |
| Date: | 2011-11-24 14:41:45 |
| Message-ID: | 1322145659-sup-9035@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Florian Weimer's message of jue nov 24 11:31:29 -0300 2011:
>
> * Alvaro Herrera:
>
> > I think we should just propose something that will not work in JDBC.
>
> I'm not sure if this is a good idea. 8-)
>
> I plan to add UNIX Domain socket support to the JDBC driver.
> Eventually, the JDK will expose UNIX Domain sockets to Java code, too
> (they are already used internally for management functions).
Well, in that case, the JDBC could simply adopt whatever syntax that
libpq ends up adopting. I just meant "something that will not work in
JDBC *right now*" (i.e. with no local socket support).
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Shulgin | 2011-11-24 14:44:39 | Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq |
| Previous Message | Alexander Shulgin | 2011-11-24 14:40:00 | Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq |