Re: a query on stored procedures/functions in pgsql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Neil D'Souza" <neil(dot)xavier(dot)dsouza(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: a query on stored procedures/functions in pgsql
Date: 2010-10-21 05:05:23
Message-ID: 13219.1287637523@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Neil D'Souza" <neil(dot)xavier(dot)dsouza(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thank you for the quick reply. The example I constructed was
> specifically for this post. I modified the function as below and it
> works fine now. It would be great if the point you mentioned was a
> note in the PGSQL Documentation (or did I miss it).

As of 9.0, plpgsql's default behavior is to throw an error when there's
an ambiguity of this sort.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Uckun 2010-10-21 05:05:36 Re: Updates, deletes and inserts are very slow. What can I do make them bearable?
Previous Message Tim Uckun 2010-10-21 05:05:00 Re: Updates, deletes and inserts are very slow. What can I do make them bearable?