Re: Core Extensions relocation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Core Extensions relocation
Date: 2011-11-17 20:18:49
Message-ID: 1321561129.7616.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2011-11-14 at 20:44 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> The very specific problem I was most concerned about eliminating was
> people discovering they needed an extension to troubleshoot
> performance or corruption issues, only to discover it wasn't
> available--because they hadn't installed the postgresql-contrib
> package.

Who's to say that after this, the core extensions won't end up in a new
separate package postgresql-extensions (or similar) or might even stay
in postgresql-contrib, for compatibility?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-11-17 20:50:20 Re: declarations of range-vs-element <@ and @>
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-11-17 19:25:03 Re: Refactoring on DROP/ALTER SET SCHEMA/ALTER RENAME TO statement